Duplicate and personalize this scorecard to leverage in your own sales hiring cycles.
Created By: Emery Rosansky, VP of Founder Success & GTM at First Round
Competency | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Scrappiness / Builder mentality | No experience building 0-1. Big company vibes. Only in cushy roles. | Limited experience 0-1. No clear motivation to join a startup. Mostly cushy companies with lots of resources. | Strong motivation to join a startup, but no real experience… although examples of thriving in ambiguity and running through walls to solve problems with limited resources. | Strong motivation to join a startup, thrives in chaos & ambiguity, has done it before and wants to do it again. First principles thinker - won’t just copy & paste what have seen before. Proven experienced doing a lot with a little. |
Organized / process-driven | Unorganized and all over the place with their responses and written task. | Not strong attention to detail - can’t create structure from chaos. | Somewhat strong attention to detail. Can drive process if given some direction. | Strong attention to detail. Can take complex topics and break it down into linear thoughts & clear structure. |
Exceptional communicator | Flustered, incoherent and/or unclear in their communication | Communicates ok but not with confidence or extreme clarity. Talks too much or too little. | Good communicator overall but struggles with either content (talks too much or too little) or delivery (confidence, pace, tone etc) | Strong communicator, able to share ideas and thoughts (written and orally) clearly, confidently and in an organized fashion. |
Confident & charismatic | Lacks confidence in their comms. Hard to imagine them in front of customers. | Fairly confident but not super engaging. | Confident and engaging but not particularly charismatic. | This person comes off disarming and credible and I’m confident customers will leave the call feeling like they want to engage with / buy from this person. |
Analytical and data driven | Has no sense of their sales math | Has some sense of their metrics in previous roles but it’s limited to basics like quota achievement | Knows what data they should be looking at but does not consistently use data in their job. | Able to confidently and accurately describe how he/she has used data to drive their decisions and actions. Proactively seeks out this data. |
Self aware and coachable | Lacks awareness | Has some awareness of strengths and weaknesses but doesn’t seem focused on addressing them. | Self aware but guarded in discussing the specifics. Some ego still in the way. | Self aware and comfortable talking about weaknesses. Shares tangible examples of personal and professional growth. |
Has done the job | No experience closing at all. Not a top rep. | No experience closing in our ICP. | Experience selling, but mostly not in our ICP. | Experience selling a range of deals, including our ICP. Consistently top-performing rep. |
Deep understanding of key sales disciplines like discovery, objection handling and negotiation. | ||||
Technical and domain expertise | Not technical and won’t understand our industry or product. | Somewhat technical (understands most terminology) but will need to rely on Sales Engineers/Founders | Has some experience selling and demoing technical products but is accustomed to relying on Sales Engineers. Hasn’t worked in the industry but gets the concepts. | Very technically savvy, able to explain technical concepts. Was or could be a sales engineer. Worked for a company who sold to a similar persona. |
Demonstrates [insert company] Values | Won’t get along with team. Doesn’t demonstrate values. | Neutral to negative fit. Demonstrates some but not all values. | Neutral to positive fit. Demonstrates all values, but does not exceed at them. | Exceeds all values. |